Negativity bias is a well-documented psychological phenomenon in which people tend to be more affected by negative experiences than positive ones. Studies suggest that it takes roughly five positive interactions to counteract the effect of a single negative one. That means even a handful of negative responses can disproportionately impact the overall perception of a product or service. It’s like getting 10 compliments on your new haircut but only remembering the one person who said, "Interesting choice!"
This bias has profound implications across various fields, especially customer surveys. Here's why this happens and some factors that play a role:
- Recency Effect: Our brains tend to remember the most recent events most vividly, so a negative experience, even if it's isolated, can stick in our minds longer than a string of positive ones. It’s like leaving a restaurant after an amazing meal but only recalling the server spilling water on you at the end.
- Cognitive Dissonance: When we experience a mismatch between our expectations and the actual outcome, our brains struggle to reconcile the difference, often making us feel more negative about the experience. If you book a 5-star hotel expecting luxury but find a leaky faucet, suddenly, the entire stay feels ruined.
- Confirmation Bias: If we expect a service to be bad, we’re more likely to notice and remember its flaws while ignoring anything good. It’s like deciding you don’t like pineapple on pizza and refusing to acknowledge the perfect cheese-to-sauce ratio.
The Mobility Program Perspective:
Every mobility manager has probably experienced negativity bias. It shows up as an assignment that went flawlessly except that the final household goods shipment was delayed. It might look like a series of moves into a new, difficult location that all go pretty well, but one service doesn't meet expectations leading to an overall sentiment that the program is struggling.
Negativity bias doesn’t just impact employee satisfaction. It can also skew how mobility teams perceive their own programs. For years, many have assumed that "no noise" (meaning no negative employee feedback) equates to success. But is silence truly golden, or does it simply mean employees aren’t speaking up?
We've seen mobility programs where one or two service issues lead teams to overperceive that the entire program is a mess, even though overall satisfaction levels remain quite high. Much like customer surveys, if mobility leaders only focus on the rare but loud complaints, they may miss the broader picture—one where the majority of employees are actually satisfied with their relocation experience.
So, how can organizations counteract negativity bias in customer surveys and mobility programs? One effective approach is to empower employees with a stronger sense of control over their experiences. When relocating employees get to make choices that shape their own journey—whether it's selecting from a range of relocation options, choosing their preferred service providers, or determining their work arrangements—they are more likely to take ownership of the outcomes. This sense of autonomy shifts the focus from external frustrations to personal responsibility and engagement, reducing the weight of negativity bias.
By creating environments where employees feel in control, autonomous, and engaged in decision-making, you can boost overall satisfaction and create a more balanced perception of experiences. In both mobility programs and customer feedback mechanisms, implementing strategies that reinforce choice and accountability can lead to more constructive, fair, and comprehensive evaluations, ultimately improving everyone's relocation experience.
And if you're interested in some related discussions, here are a couple of other articles on bias, satisfaction, and putting employees in control:
How is negativity bias impacting your mobility program?
Elevating mobility by dancing to the beat of data and analytics
What's on your "menu" of relocation benefit options?